Blog

March 9, 2026
5 min

Settlement Complete: MJL Enterprises fulfils obligations for historical projects

article

We are proud to announce that, as promised, MJL Enterprises has fully repaid all outstanding obligations related to our historical projects previously hosted on the Crowdestate platform.

This milestone marks the total closure of a chapter that began in 2021. Despite the various structural challenges and the eventual shutdown of the intermediary platform, our commitment to our investors remained the priority for us.

Key facts regarding the settlement:

To provide full transparency to our community and the P2P market, here are the audited facts regarding the repayment of the projects (including Sprukstes and Mailīšu Street 13, Riga):

  • The borrower: SIA Valdemāra 143 (a subsidiary of MJL Enterprises).
  • The original financing involved two historical projects with a total registered security limit of €1.15 million.
  • The amount has been repaid in full. We have exceeded the original contractual limits to ensure investors were not penalised by platform delays. The total repayment reached approximately €1.45 million.
  • 100% of the principal amount was covered.
    • 100% of all accrued interest since 2021.
    • An additional 3% penalty fee for investors.
    • All of Crowdestate’s outstanding invoices and legal fees.
  • Repayments were sourced entirely from MJL’s own capital and stable cash flow from our Jelgava project (developed in cooperation with the European Commission and ALTUM) and other projects. No investor funds from the Devon platform were used to cover these historical debts.

Integrity beyond the “paper promise"

In the P2P world, problematic projects often end in partial recoveries or years of litigation. By stepping in to cover amounts exceeding the registered security limit, MJL Enterprises has demonstrated that our group guarantee is a tangible financial reality, not just a marketing term.

"Working with partners and fulfilling our obligations has been our core principle for over 20 years. With this final payment in February, we maintain our track record of a zero default rate across our entire history." — Jānis Lagzdiņš, CEO of MJL Enterprises and Devon platform

Why this matters for the Devon community

The difficulties we faced with third-party management at Crowdestate, ranging from shifting leadership to a lack of communication during their shutdown, were the primary catalysts for the creation of Devon.

By transitioning to our own platform, we have eliminated the "intermediary risk." We now have:

  1. Direct Control: We manage the financing and the development flow.
  2. Direct Communication: No more "broken telephone" between the developer and the investor.
  3. Proven Resilience: We have shown that even when an external platform fails, MJL Enterprises stands by its projects until the very last cent is returned.

If you have any queries regarding MJL Enterprises and Crowdestate settlement, please contact us at [email protected]


You may like these articles

article
October 12, 2026
5 min

Operations overview / September

The first month of autumn is behind us, and we continue to actively work on MJL Group’s projects and funding developments. September brought further progress across construction projects, alongside continued work on strengthening platform's legal and regulatory framework, including a positive legal assessment from KPMG Germany.

article
September 25, 2026
5 min

Operations overview / August

August was an important month for Devon, with progress across both the platform’s regulatory foundation and its underlying development portfolio. A key milestone was the publication of the KPMG Germany legal opinion, providing further clarity on Devon’s loan structure and its treatment under German regulatory requirements.

article
August 28, 2026
6 min

Executive Summary - KPMG Germany Legal Opinion

KPMG Germany has conducted a legal assessment of Devon’s loan structure and contractual framework under the applicable German regulatory requirements, with particular focus on whether Devon could be classified as conducting deposit-taking business. Below is a summary of KPMG’s general findings and regulatory conclusions.